Imagine you’re running a business worth over $100 billion. When you pass it down to your kids, you’d expect a hefty tax bill, right? Not if you’re the Walton family—the heirs behind Walmart. They’ve mastered legal strategies to pass on their wealth while avoiding most estate taxes. And they’re not alone. Billionaires often use these tactics to dodge a tax designed to prevent the ultra-rich from hoarding wealth across generations. Here’s a breakdown of how they do it and why it matters.

How Big Is the Estate Tax Problem? Last year, America’s estate and gift taxes brought in just $14 billion. That’s a tiny fraction (about 1%) of the $1.2 trillion transferred through inheritance annually, according to former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers. He argues that this gap is a sign of a “broken system.”

The Waltons’ approach illustrates how billionaires exploit this broken system using tools like Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) and Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs)—two loopholes that, if closed, could raise $2 billion in taxes every year. But Congress hasn’t taken action, despite numerous reform proposals.

A Legacy Built on Smart Planning Sam Walton, Walmart’s founder, started planning to avoid estate taxes way back in 1953, long before his retail empire took off. He gave 20% of his fledgling business to each of his kids when his oldest child was just 9. Why? As Sam explained in his autobiography Made in America, giving assets away early prevents future tax headaches because their value hasn’t skyrocketed yet.

This strategy worked brilliantly. Walmart became a global giant, and the Waltons joined the ranks of the richest families in history, much like the Rockefellers before them. The Rockefellers also pioneered tax-avoidance techniques, which Congress tried to limit—but families like the Waltons have always found new ways around the rules.

Jackie O. Trusts: A Billionaire’s Best Friend One of the most effective tools in the Waltons’ arsenal is the Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (CLAT), nicknamed the “Jackie O.” trust after Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis. Here’s how it works:

The donor (say, Helen Walton) sets up a trust and locks in assets for 20-30 years. Every year, the trust donates a set amount to charity. At the end of the trust’s term, whatever is left goes to the donor’s heirs tax-free.

The trick lies in how the IRS calculates the tax owed when the trust is set up. The IRS uses a formula based on current interest rates (which have been historically low since 2009). If the trust’s investments perform better than those low rates, the extra wealth passes to the heirs tax-free. For example, if the IRS assumes a 1.4% growth rate, but the investments grow by 10%, the difference bypasses taxes altogether.

This loophole is so effective that even if the trust gives millions to charity, the family could still end up richer than if they hadn’t donated anything.

Family Limited Partnerships: Discounting Wealth Another trick the Waltons use is holding their wealth in a Family Limited Partnership (FLP). By doing this, they can claim that the assets are worth less than their actual market value—sometimes 30% less. Why? Because the law allows them to discount the value of assets when they’re transferred to family members if they’re held within a partnership.

For example, let’s say the Waltons transfer $1 billion in Walmart stock through an FLP. Thanks to the discount loophole, they might only have to pay taxes as if the stock were worth $700 million. That’s a huge savings.

Estate tax experts have criticized this loophole, calling it a “world of unreality” because it lets the ultra-rich undervalue their fortunes. But Congress has repeatedly failed to close it, despite proposals from multiple administrations, including Barack Obama’s.

GRATs: A “Heads I Win, Tails We Tie” Bet One of the most famous loopholes the Waltons use is the Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT), which became popular thanks to a legal battle won by Sam Walton’s sister-in-law, Audrey Walton. Here’s how it works:

A wealthy individual (like Audrey) sets up a trust and puts in assets, such as Walmart stock. The trust pays the donor an annuity for a set period—say, two years. If the assets grow in value during that time, whatever is left over goes to the donor’s heirs tax-free.

Audrey Walton set up GRATs in 1993 with $200 million worth of Walmart stock. She claimed she owed no gift tax because, on paper, the IRS formula predicted no leftover value for her heirs. But if the assets grow faster than the IRS estimate, the heirs get the surplus tax-free.

This strategy is so advantageous that it’s often described as “heads I win, tails we tie” because even if the investment doesn’t grow, the family doesn’t lose anything. Today, billionaires like the Coors family and Nike’s founder, Phil Knight, also use GRATs to pass down their fortunes.

What’s Stopping Reform? Despite repeated efforts by presidents like Obama to close these loopholes, Congress hasn’t acted. The Walton family’s influence, along with pushback from other billionaires, likely plays a role. The Obama administration estimated that closing the GRAT loophole alone could save $3.9 billion over 10 years, but lawmakers haven’t followed through.

Why It Matters When billionaires like the Waltons avoid estate taxes, it shifts the burden to everyone else. The estate tax was designed to prevent the creation of permanent dynasties and ensure that the wealthiest Americans contribute their share to public programs. But as it stands, most of their wealth escapes taxation, allowing them to grow even richer while public resources remain underfunded.

Unless lawmakers act, families like the Waltons will continue passing down billions tax-free, further widening the wealth gap in America. The question is: will Congress ever step in, or will billionaires always stay one step ahead?

WRITE YOUR ESTATE PLAN TODAY