Connecticut Attorney General William Tong has once again placed consumer protection and public safety at the center of a major multistate enforcement action, this time leading a sweeping settlement with Hyundai and Kia over their sale of vehicles that lacked industry-standard anti-theft technology. The agreement resolves claims brought by dozens of attorneys general nationwide alleging that the automakers’ design decisions directly contributed to a nationwide surge in car thefts, reckless driving incidents, and serious public safety risks.

For years, Hyundai and Kia sold millions of vehicles without engine immobilizers, a basic and widely adopted anti-theft feature that prevents a car from starting without a properly coded key. While nearly all other major manufacturers treated immobilizers as standard equipment, Hyundai and Kia chose not to include them in large portions of their fleets sold between 2011 and 2022. That omission proved disastrous once a simple theft method spread rapidly on social media, allowing thieves to start these vehicles in minutes. What followed was not just an increase in stolen cars, but a wave of joy riding, collisions, injuries, and in some cases deaths, turning what might have seemed like a technical design choice into a full-blown public safety crisis.

The settlement acknowledges the real-world consequences of that decision and forces meaningful corrective action. Hyundai and Kia have agreed to equip all future vehicles sold in the United States with engine immobilizer technology or its equivalent, bringing them in line with industry standards they had previously lagged behind. For vehicles already on the road, the agreement goes further than prior voluntary measures. The companies must now offer a free hardware fix in the form of zinc-reinforced ignition cylinder protectors to all affected vehicles, not just a limited subset. This hardware physically blocks access to the ignition assembly, addressing concerns raised by states that earlier software updates could be bypassed by determined thieves.

Consumer relief is also a central part of the settlement. Owners whose vehicles were stolen or damaged, even after receiving software updates, may be eligible for restitution covering theft-related losses. Depending on the circumstances, consumers can recover funds for total losses, partial losses, attempted theft damage, towing, transportation costs, insurance deductibles, and certain increased insurance expenses. Collectively, Hyundai and Kia have committed millions of dollars toward consumer restitution, alongside additional payments to states to offset the costs of investigation and enforcement. Connecticut alone will receive just under two hundred thousand dollars, reflecting the nearly one hundred thousand impacted vehicles sold in the state.

Attorney General Tong has been explicit about why this settlement matters beyond dollars and repairs. The case underscores that automakers cannot cut corners on safety features without accountability, especially when those choices predictably expose consumers and communities to harm. A car is not just a product; it is an essential part of daily life, tied to work, family, and basic mobility. When vehicles become easy targets for theft, the fallout ripples outward, disrupting lives and straining law enforcement and emergency systems.

Equally important is what this settlement signals going forward. It shows that state attorneys general are willing to work collectively to address nationwide consumer harms, even when companies deny wrongdoing. It also reinforces a broader principle in consumer protection law: companies may innovate and compete, but they must meet baseline safety expectations and respond swiftly when their products create foreseeable risks. When they fail to do so, enforcement will follow.

For consumers who own affected Hyundai or Kia vehicles, the message is practical as well as legal. Free protective hardware is available, claims for compensation may be open, and taking advantage of these remedies can help prevent further theft and loss. For the auto industry, the message is even clearer. Public safety is not optional, industry standards exist for a reason, and ignoring them can lead not only to reputational damage but to long-term legal and financial consequences.

Based on the sheer volume of Kia vehicles stolen during the peak years of the theft crisis, the financial exposure created by the settlement is potentially enormous. Under the agreement, eligible consumers may recover up to $4,500 per claim for a total loss tied to a qualifying theft, and when that figure is applied across tens of thousands of stolen vehicles nationwide, the numbers escalate quickly. Even using conservative theft data from a single year, multiplying thousands of thefts by the maximum per-claim reimbursement produces totals in the tens of millions of dollars, and when spread across multiple years, multiple models, attempted thefts, partial losses, and related expenses, the potential liability climbs into the hundreds of millions. While the settlement includes caps and eligibility limits, the scale of the theft epidemic underscores just how costly the absence of industry-standard anti-theft technology became, not only for consumers and public safety, but for Kia itself as it now absorbs the downstream financial consequences of those design decisions.

IF YOU’VE BEEN INJURED CONTACT US

Brenda K
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“My husband and I recently went to the office. We wanted to have a will made. We needed revisions and chose a different option.”

Brendan Kru
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Jake did a great job of putting together estate paperwork for my father. He was very professional and thorough in his work.”

Chris Prigg
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Very knowledgeable and professional. Referred to him by a friend and had a great experience. Highly recommend.”

Ariel Ventura
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“I recently worked with Attorney Jake Dreszler to draft my will, and I couldn’t be more pleased with the experience.”

Rita Levin
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Jake is a fantastic lawyer and super knowledgeable. He is very kind and professional in his dealings.”

Debra Kohn
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Jake is a very professional individual. He takes what he does very seriously and I couldn’t recommend a better lawyer.”

Bobby Malinick
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Jake is an excellent lawyer for what you need.”

Larry Koslofsky
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Professional and highly recommended.”

Lori Raut
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“I highly recommend Attorney Dreszler for all your legal needs. Jake is very smart, attentive, and protective of his clients.”

Lori Raut
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“I highly recommend Attorney Dreszler for all your legal needs. Jake is very smart, attentive, and protective of his clients.”

Joseph Whiteman
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Jake is an extremely good attorney. He always gets back to you very promptly and even shares small updates and insights.”

Jose J Rodriguez
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Jake provided excellent professional service in preparing our wills, powers of attorney, and health proxies.”

Ken R
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“I have known Jake for years, well before he became an attorney. I was always impressed with his thoughtfulness and professionalism.”

Zachary Scura
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Attorney Dreszler is extremely knowledgeable and well suited to help with legal advice or representation.”

Joseph P
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“A very detail-oriented attorney who will do right by his clients. Diligent, respectful, and highly professional.”

Karla Dulin
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Attorney Dreszler is an outstanding attorney. He is incredibly knowledgeable, responsive, and professional. Highly recommend.”

Faith
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Would recommend. It’s obvious he loves what he does, and it shows in his work.”

Mayer Miles
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
“Jake was referred to me by a good friend. He handled my will and trust for a reasonable price and explained everything clearly and understandably.”